a thought

Jan. 2nd, 2010 04:25 pm
calimac: (puzzle)
[personal profile] calimac
My definition of a science-fiction fan as a person who would jump up at the line "Strike flat the thick rotundity o' the world" and earnestly inform Lear, "The world isn't round, it's an oblate spheroid," has been amply confirmed over the past few days.

Date: 2010-01-03 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scribblerworks.livejournal.com
Now I wonder at the circumstances of the outburst.

And of course, in defense of the Bard, snipe back by saying "Cannot you let 'thick rotundity' suffice for 'oblate spheroid'? 'Twould serve the speach far better."

:D

Date: 2010-01-03 04:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
That's the equivalent of exactly what I did say. You think it helped?

In the comments, here and here.

Date: 2010-01-03 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scribblerworks.livejournal.com
Oh, lordie! My sympathies!

Yes, I had that calendar/decades discussion on Facebook on a friend's board. He's a stickler for the "end of decade" exactitude. I sided with him, but was fascinated by how locked in mindset people can be.

People don't seem to register that saying "the first decade of the century" can refer to a different set of objects than "the ten years that have a double 0 after the 2". If I'd been sharp at the time, I would have asked "What is the current century called?" But really, that would just be me indulging my nit-picking.

Date: 2010-01-03 10:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
Well, my mindset - and those of most people who take my view - is that a decade can be any span of ten years you want it to be, but since we're using it to sum up things like popular culture and not to perform precise arithmetical calculations, it's obtuse not to notice that the odometer turning version (0-9) is the popular choice. Nor are they calling it "the first decade of the century" (in any case a century also can be 00-99), but nineties/oughties or naughties/teens.

It's the other side which, locked into an irrelevant rigid adherence to theoretical mathematics, insists that a decade can only be 1-0.

Date: 2010-01-03 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] margdean56.livejournal.com
Heh. My comeback is that an oblate spheroid might not be exactly the same as a sphere, but they're both round (as opposed to flat, cubical, etc.) :)

Profile

calimac: (Default)
calimac

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 08:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios