a thought
My definition of a science-fiction fan as a person who would jump up at the line "Strike flat the thick rotundity o' the world" and earnestly inform Lear, "The world isn't round, it's an oblate spheroid," has been amply confirmed over the past few days.
no subject
And of course, in defense of the Bard, snipe back by saying "Cannot you let 'thick rotundity' suffice for 'oblate spheroid'? 'Twould serve the speach far better."
:D
no subject
In the comments, here and here.
no subject
Yes, I had that calendar/decades discussion on Facebook on a friend's board. He's a stickler for the "end of decade" exactitude. I sided with him, but was fascinated by how locked in mindset people can be.
People don't seem to register that saying "the first decade of the century" can refer to a different set of objects than "the ten years that have a double 0 after the 2". If I'd been sharp at the time, I would have asked "What is the current century called?" But really, that would just be me indulging my nit-picking.
no subject
It's the other side which, locked into an irrelevant rigid adherence to theoretical mathematics, insists that a decade can only be 1-0.
no subject