a guide

Mar. 13th, 2026 09:58 pm
calimac: (Default)
[personal profile] calimac
I wrote to Pat Murphy. I said we all liked her book, there was just one small error. She asked for more information. I sent her an explanation. Rather than being put off by this core dump, she thanked me for it and asked if she could copy my e-mail to another author who was interested. I said don't bother, I've put the whole thing online. Pass it along to anyone who's interested.

So here it is, "A Guide to Terms of Address for British Nobility." Let me know if there's anything wrong, or anything left out you think is necessary.

Date: 2026-03-14 12:35 pm (UTC)
oursin: Photograph of Queen Victoria, overwritten with Not Amused (queen victoria is not amused)
From: [personal profile] oursin
Meant to comment before, not just fiction writers who get this wrong - have come across the occasional egregious error by academics - e.g., no, he is not Sir [Last Name] - in at least one instance where the offender was a Victorianist who had apparently previously published on Trollope, which one would have thought conveyed a few clues.

Date: 2026-03-15 02:25 pm (UTC)
andrewducker: (Default)
From: [personal profile] andrewducker

A friend says: "There's a Baroness von Krakenfeldt in Gilbert and Sullivan's The Grand Duke (premiered 1896), so either Baroness was used in the 19thC (whether for barons' wives (presumably widow in this case, as she's now betrothed to the Grand Duke) or for women with baron titles in their own right, or both), or Gilbert actually writing in the 19thC got it wrong."

Date: 2026-03-15 02:48 pm (UTC)
andrewducker: (Default)
From: [personal profile] andrewducker

Aaaah, that would make sense! There would definitely be different rules there!

Profile

calimac: (Default)
calimac

April 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 234
5 6 7 8 910 11
12 131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 14th, 2026 09:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios