calimac: (Haydn)
[personal profile] calimac
The Vienna Philharmonic, perhaps the most distinguished orchestra in the world (an elderly and rather deaf lady to whom I reported that I'd been to them looked blank for a moment, and then said, "I heard 'harmonica'") came back to Berkeley - I reviewed them when they were here before, three years ago - for another three concerts, this time scheduled to be with three different conductors.

My editor wanted to send me to review the Saturday concert, because it was being conducted by the new music director of the Boston Symphony, whom we were curious to hear out here. But my schedule made that impossible, and between Friday's and Sunday's we picked Sunday's, mostly because I wanted to hear the VPO play Bruckner's Sixth enough that I might have bought my own ticket.

Sunday proved fortunate for two reasons, though someone at the concert, learning that I was a reviewer, began to berate me for not reviewing the first concert in the series, even though I said it probably wouldn't see print soon enough to affect sales for the last concert. The first reason is that the Friday concert got drastically poor reviews. The second reason is that the scheduled conductor of the Sunday concert cancelled at the last minute, leaving his Saturday colleague to substitute for him. So I got to hear him after all.

One of the editors, reacting to this remarkable save by the fates, kindly commented on the good luck I bring wherever I go. Well, not so good for the ailing conductor who had to be replaced, and I have someone on a bed of anguish whom I dearly wish I could have brought some good luck to when it could still have helped, but it was a kind thought.

My review mentioned the self-flagellating panel discussions on the history of the orchestra, but I had no space to get into that and only time for a little of it. (Nothing about the orchestra's sex ratio that I heard: that was not yet an issue at the time of the world wars. Expelling all its Jews and joining the Nazi Party en masse, however, was.) What most intrigued me, however, was the talk by this unreconstructed Schoenbergian I mentioned. He mocked the idea that art should be a constant to hold on to in a changing world, and the audience duly tittered. He believed that the function of art is to act as a shock wave heralding changes in society. That put him in direct conflict not only with the following speaker, an orchestra representative who mentioned how its concerts provided solace (his word) to the Austrian people during World War I, as well as its role in acting as a cultural ambassador for the Emperor Karl's peace feelers - neither of which you could do by offending listeners with artistic shock waves - but with the lush, moving performance of Schoenberg's own early, pre-atonal Verklärte Nacht that we'd just heard. I say he was speaking arrant nonsense. The function of art is to move and affect the hearer or viewer emotionally. If you can do that by being edgy, fine, but that's not the only permissible way; and getting edgier and edgier to outdo previous generations of edginess rapidly yields diminishing returns: you wind up triumphantly holding up the package and leaving out the contents.

But that wasn't all I did. Seeing that I would be with the VPO in the afternoon, I checked to see what the Freight and Salvage, just a few blocks away downtown, was playing in the evening. Väsen: "leading Swedish folk revivalists." Sounded good, so I went. I used to attend lots of folk concerts. I've trailed off for various reasons, one of which is that this prime venue is a long drive from home, and my principal nudge to go, a friend who would call me up and say things like "I want to hear Dougie MacLean at the Freight!", was long ago bought by Microsoft and shipped off to Seattle. It's been so long, in fact, that this was my first visit to the Freight's no longer so new quarters downtown. I was impressed. It's superior in sight lines, comfort, general maneuverability, and - above all - restrooms to the old home, at little cost in acoustics or in warm and toasty atmosphere. It's still too dark to read in, even before the houselights go down. I didn't see anyone I knew, but the house was filled with people who looked like I ought to know them. I sat there in contentment as the peaceful and relaxing sound of viola, guitar, and nykelharpa (a long viol with accordion-like keys as string stops) filled the air, and let Schoenbergian artistic theory go hang itself.

Date: 2014-03-12 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmcmck.livejournal.com
Off to Vienna later in the year and you realise I'm now going to be looking out for the harmonica! :o)

Art as a shock wave? Well maybe, but it's also so much more than that. Early Schoenberg makes me regret the road he later took (although he remained a fine painter).

I've seen Dougie MacLean more than a few times and the Swedish folklore revivalists sounds like a great evening.

Date: 2014-03-12 06:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] randy-byers.livejournal.com
Tangential, but speaking of shocks (not shock waves), I just stumbled upon this in Kent Jones' "Critical Condition":

Approaching the artwork with humility, as [Manny] Farber and [Andrew] Sarris suggested (as opposed to arrogance or unctuous subservience), being precise about one’s place in relation to it (as opposed to drifting from rapt respondent to rival creator to impartial observer to public advocate, and then back again), and understanding oneself as a transmitter rather than a final arbiter or an entertainer, is to move toward fulfilling the task of criticism as defined by [André] Bazin: “To prolong as much as possible in the intelligence and sensibility of those who read it the original shock of the work of art.”

Date: 2014-03-13 12:27 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Thanks for posting that link. It takes a while, but I was interested to see that Jones, whose opinions on individual films I often disagree with, eventually arrives at the same point Stanley Kauffmann once made while reviewing of a re-release of Max Ophuls's Lola Montes, beloved of the auteurist critics: they regularly play down the weak aspects of films by directors whose typical themes or style they admire.

-MTD/neb

Date: 2014-03-13 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] randy-byers.livejournal.com
I think that happens to book critics too. We find things we like in the works of the artists we admire, even their weaker works. (I'm lowbrow enough that my favorite film by Ophuls is Caught, although I still haven't seen The Reckless Moment.)

Profile

calimac: (Default)
calimac

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 789 10
1112 13 1415 1617
1819 20 21 222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 08:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios