Readercon query

[calimac]

Could someone explain to me the relationship between 1) the concom that just reversed and overruled the board's decision, 2) the board that issued the infamous two-year suspension, 3) the concom that actually ran this year's convention? Because, as it appears, the concom (3) referred the matter to the board, which was then overruled by the concom (1). What? I do not think I grasp the administrative structure here.

Comments

[kalimac.livejournal.com]

Its imperfection is sufficient to offer me no help whatever. I'm not querying who's going to put on the next Readercon in the absence of a board. But Assink couldn't overrule the board's decisions, even in the absence of a board.

[irontongue.livejournal.com]

Perhaps I'll ask a lawyer about that, because I am not one.