Readercon query

[calimac]

Could someone explain to me the relationship between 1) the concom that just reversed and overruled the board's decision, 2) the board that issued the infamous two-year suspension, 3) the concom that actually ran this year's convention? Because, as it appears, the concom (3) referred the matter to the board, which was then overruled by the concom (1). What? I do not think I grasp the administrative structure here.

Comments

[kalimac.livejournal.com]

That sounds more like a Worldcon, minus the Business Meeting, than any small con I know. Is zReadercon that large and complex? Or is concom 3 a subcommittee of concom 1?