Readercon query
Aug. 5th, 2012 01:52 pmCould someone explain to me the relationship between 1) the concom that just reversed and overruled the board's decision, 2) the board that issued the infamous two-year suspension, 3) the concom that actually ran this year's convention? Because, as it appears, the concom (3) referred the matter to the board, which was then overruled by the concom (1). What? I do not think I grasp the administrative structure here.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-06 10:37 am (UTC)I believe their system is along the lines of MNSTF, with the board controlling the purse strings and the policies of the convention at corporate level.
But, it's 5:42 and having woken up from a nightmare, I could be wrong.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-06 01:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-06 01:57 pm (UTC)I will grant that there are some members of the board who keep getting elected year after year, but that's just the people choice.