calimac: (Default)
[personal profile] calimac
1. The Asian earthquake/tsunami seems to be turning out to be the worst single natural disaster in centuries. Oh my. Now would be the time, if we had a president like Bill Clinton or even Ronald Reagan, for him to make a moving statement that would focus our grief and concern. As it is, I feel curiously unfocused and distanced from this tragedy.

2. But what I mostly wonder is, how difficult is it to use several hours' warning to tell people to get away from the beach? Claims that it's difficult to predict where a tsunami will strike are irrelevant: directly across open ocean from a quake this size it's sufficiently likely to make it worth the trouble.

3. Susan Sontag died. Sorry to say I've never read much by her. But the outpouring of abuse she's taken since 9/11 seems senseless to me: what she said at the time was overstated for effect but nothing more than that, and nothing at all to get all hot about.

4. [livejournal.com profile] supergee took a Music Quiz, or that's what it's called. Actually it's an Esoteric Varieties of Current Pop Music Quiz. I can't even take the quiz: I don't understand what half of the statements mean. Of course, I don't understand the answers, either: I have no idea what Emo, Industrial, Ska, or Hardcore mean as types of music, or what the difference is between Indie and Indie Rock. My favorite types of rock/pop music are early 70s Electric Folk, equally early 70s Art Rock (very selectively), all periods of Acoustic Singer-Songwriter, and mid-60s Studio-Experimental Concept Songs, in that order. I don't need a cryptic quiz to tell me that, and I doubt any of those categories register on this quizmaker's brain anyhow.

5. Found in library, a newish (2002) collection of essays by David Lodge, Consciousness & The Novel. Not as interesting as The Practice of Writing or the fantastically informative and entertaining The Art of Fiction, both of which I own copies of, it interested me most for its lucid surveys of Evelyn Waugh's early novels and John Updike's Bech books, two bodies of work I've dipped into but don't know well. I was also amused by Lodge's introduction to a description of Richard Powers' Galatea 2.2.
I discovered this book only recently, perhaps because Powers is not as well known in Britain as in America. ... His work tends to be categorised with genre fiction like the techno-thriller and science fiction rather than literary fiction, and the title of Galatea 2.2 encourages such a misapprehension. In fact he is a very literary novelist, and Galatea 2.2 is not the name of a spaceship or a distant star, but an allusion to the myth of Pygmalion.
I'm inclined to think we sci-fi guys still have a ways to go before even the sympathetic literati take us seriously.

Sontag

Date: 2004-12-30 03:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
Any particular recommendations to start with?

Re: Sontag

Date: 2004-12-31 02:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jerrykaufman.livejournal.com
It's been years since I read them, but I'd suggest Against Interpretation, a collection of essays (it includes an essay about the connection between Japan's memories of being a-bombed in WWII and their cycle of Godzilla movies), and On Photography, her book on the ways that photography has affected our culture.

Profile

calimac: (Default)
calimac

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 789 10
1112 13 1415 1617
1819 20 21 222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 09:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios