Then you are a damn malevolent fool who wishes to endanger the public health and safety. I'm sorry, I cannot put it any less strongly than that. Do not tell me that private enterprise will enforce this. We tried that already; that's why we have an FDA in the first place.
I didn't particularly propose to argue for libertarian positions with you; that wasn't the point of my comment, and I would not expect to convince you, certainly not in the space of a brief exchange of comments on lj. I was simply noting my position.
Do you have a choice you favor for the president who did the greatest active harm, as opposed to simply being inept?
Some positions are merely worth noting. You advocate making the food I eat and the drugs I take positively unsafe. I will not let that pass without the strongest possible denunciation.
Greatest active harm? Biased by the degree we're suffering from it today, but probably: 1. W. 2. Nixon. 3. Reagan.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2011-02-21 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-21 10:09 pm (UTC)Do you have a choice you favor for the president who did the greatest active harm, as opposed to simply being inept?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-21 10:17 pm (UTC)Greatest active harm? Biased by the degree we're suffering from it today, but probably:
1. W.
2. Nixon.
3. Reagan.