musical cul-de-sac
Jan. 21st, 2009 07:20 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This article will explain the brief and cryptic concert reviews I've been dropping into LJ lately. I spent most of my time for four days immersed in a Stanford musicological symposium, largely so that I could write the article. (I'm a reporter, a journalist! Yikes!)
irontongue was there too, and I hope she resumes writing about it.
Here's a comment from one of the participants, who expresses doubt about the validity of the interpretive tradition, what I mentioned in my article by noting that the word "grandpupil" turned up a lot. I had a lot to cover in the article and needed to keep it short, so I left my own reaction out, but I can add here that I felt a little skeptical when presenters argued that X's teacher was said to have played just like Chopin by people who remembered Chopin from fifty years earlier, so therefore X had also inherited the true and authentic way to play Chopin, or "My piano teacher was the daughter of the student of the grandpupil of a guy who also taught Liszt, and here's a boring inaudible tape recording of my childhood lesson to prove how much I learned from her vague comments about how the piano must sing." Sheesh.
There are several versions of this, some of them distinctively racist, and with punchlines on varying subjects, but the one I know is the one Henry Cabot Lodge read into the Congressional Record during the investigation of the great 1920s political scandal:
You wouldn't know it to look at me, but I myself am the grandpupil of the great French composer Darius Milhaud. My harmony instructor, who taught me most of what I know about the technical nuts and bolts of music, had been a composition student of Milhaud's and talked about him all the time. But I don't think I know any more about Milhaud than anybody else who's heard his music.
What was really interesting to me was a student presentation - which I didn't mention but Irontongue did - documenting Sergei Rachmaninoff's admiration for Vladimir Horowitz's style in Rachmaninoff's piano concertos. Yet we have recordings of both of them playing the same concerto (the "Rach Three" of Shine fame), both from about this time, and they play it very differently. So what did Rach want? Maybe he simply thought, "That's not how I'd do it, but it's very good nonetheless, and just as legitimate."
Furthermore Horowitz's own style changed markedly through the subsequent decades. The student presenter implied that Horowitz was following the fashion and style of his time, but cheerfully acceded to my suggestion that Horowitz was pretty iconic in his day and that maybe fashion and style were following him.
On top of which is something I did emphasize in the article, which is, that even if a modern performer studies old recordings intently and marks up the score and tries this and that rehearsal technique in an attempt to reproduce the style of the original performer, often enough they can't do it.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Here's a comment from one of the participants, who expresses doubt about the validity of the interpretive tradition, what I mentioned in my article by noting that the word "grandpupil" turned up a lot. I had a lot to cover in the article and needed to keep it short, so I left my own reaction out, but I can add here that I felt a little skeptical when presenters argued that X's teacher was said to have played just like Chopin by people who remembered Chopin from fifty years earlier, so therefore X had also inherited the true and authentic way to play Chopin, or "My piano teacher was the daughter of the student of the grandpupil of a guy who also taught Liszt, and here's a boring inaudible tape recording of my childhood lesson to prove how much I learned from her vague comments about how the piano must sing." Sheesh.
There are several versions of this, some of them distinctively racist, and with punchlines on varying subjects, but the one I know is the one Henry Cabot Lodge read into the Congressional Record during the investigation of the great 1920s political scandal:
Absolute knowledge have I none,
But my aunt's washerwoman's sister's son
Heard a policeman on his beat
Say to a laborer on the street
That he had a letter just last week -
A letter which he did not seek -
From a Chinese merchant in Timbuctoo,
Who said that his brother in Cuba knew
Of an Indian chief in a Texas town,
Who got the dope from a circus clown,
That a man in the Klondike had it straight
From a guy in a South American state,
That a wild man over in Borneo
Was told by a woman who claimed to know,
Of a well-known society rake,
Whose mother-in-law will undertake
To prove that her husband's sister's niece
Has stated plain in a printed piece
That she has a son who never comes home
Who knows all about the Teapot Dome.
You wouldn't know it to look at me, but I myself am the grandpupil of the great French composer Darius Milhaud. My harmony instructor, who taught me most of what I know about the technical nuts and bolts of music, had been a composition student of Milhaud's and talked about him all the time. But I don't think I know any more about Milhaud than anybody else who's heard his music.
What was really interesting to me was a student presentation - which I didn't mention but Irontongue did - documenting Sergei Rachmaninoff's admiration for Vladimir Horowitz's style in Rachmaninoff's piano concertos. Yet we have recordings of both of them playing the same concerto (the "Rach Three" of Shine fame), both from about this time, and they play it very differently. So what did Rach want? Maybe he simply thought, "That's not how I'd do it, but it's very good nonetheless, and just as legitimate."
Furthermore Horowitz's own style changed markedly through the subsequent decades. The student presenter implied that Horowitz was following the fashion and style of his time, but cheerfully acceded to my suggestion that Horowitz was pretty iconic in his day and that maybe fashion and style were following him.
On top of which is something I did emphasize in the article, which is, that even if a modern performer studies old recordings intently and marks up the score and tries this and that rehearsal technique in an attempt to reproduce the style of the original performer, often enough they can't do it.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 09:43 pm (UTC)If that long made-up quotation starting "My teacher..." is a reference to Jonathan Summers and what he played of that lesson, I believe he was an adult when he studied with Michal Hambourg. If it's a reference to the generally-muddled Rosen, then right on. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-22 12:03 am (UTC)Yes, I was parodying Summers, who seemed to be falling into the same trap. Rosen was saying the opposite.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-22 12:11 am (UTC)I think the body of evidence for Koczalski's playing reflecting mid-19th c. playing is fairly strong. It includes Mikuli's playing and reactions to that, reports on Chopin's playing, many editions of Chopin, Koczalski's playing and writings, and reactions to Koczalski's playing. Jonathan Bellman, who has read and heard all the evidence, buys it.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-22 12:11 am (UTC)