technical hell again
Jan. 1st, 2026 03:17 pmThis is technical hell, not bureaucratic hell, because the bureaucracy is not really the problem, the technology is the problem.
A few days ago our tv set stopped working. If we turned it on, we got an error message saying it couldn't connect to the wireless network. (The wireless network is otherwise fine, a point I had to keep making to the technicians I talked with.)
Having been otherwise occupied earlier, I've spent most of my New Year's Day in phone calls and chats, first with my ISP (AT&T), which had me cancel the network and try to reinstall it, which didn't work. They said they could find no problem, so it must be the tv set. The tv manufacturer couldn't find any problem with the tv set, so they said the ISP must have updated to 5G, which my tv set (which is only two years old) can't handle. I should have known enough to point out to them that we're on copper wire, which AT&T told me couldn't handle 5G, so we were on exactly the broadband width that the manufacturer told me to tell the ISP to put me on.
Impasse. AT&T is going to send me new equipment, which will come in over a week. I doubt that will help either.
A few days ago our tv set stopped working. If we turned it on, we got an error message saying it couldn't connect to the wireless network. (The wireless network is otherwise fine, a point I had to keep making to the technicians I talked with.)
Having been otherwise occupied earlier, I've spent most of my New Year's Day in phone calls and chats, first with my ISP (AT&T), which had me cancel the network and try to reinstall it, which didn't work. They said they could find no problem, so it must be the tv set. The tv manufacturer couldn't find any problem with the tv set, so they said the ISP must have updated to 5G, which my tv set (which is only two years old) can't handle. I should have known enough to point out to them that we're on copper wire, which AT&T told me couldn't handle 5G, so we were on exactly the broadband width that the manufacturer told me to tell the ISP to put me on.
Impasse. AT&T is going to send me new equipment, which will come in over a week. I doubt that will help either.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-02 09:34 am (UTC)I do not recommend connecting any TV directly to the network, whether it is wifi or ethernet. From what I have read, some of the most popular smart TVs have firmware that is actively infringing viewer's privacy and is full of dark patterns. I do not know of any smart TVs that can be trusted.
I recommend using a dedicated streaming device. They are far more trustworthy to connect to your network than a TV. You can turn off the networking in the TV. It just gets video and audio from the streaming device. This is also simpler for troubleshooting. There aren't that many kinds of streaming devices. Their whole job is to connect to a network and deliver video and audio to the TV.
The best streaming device for privacy is the Apple TV 4K. It is the most expensive at $129 for wifi or $149 for wifi + ethernet. But it does the least tracking of your viewing and is the most trustworthy streaming device that I know of. You get what you pay for. Roku and Google offer streaming devices with equivalent functionality for $80. Roku has wifi-only streaming sticks for less than that. I have more concerns about privacy with the Roku and Google devices, but at least they will be better than a cheap streaming device that has insecure firmware. The Apple, Roku and Google devices will be better than any TV. TVs are the worst and most of their smart functionality needs to be disabled so they don't track you.
I have an Apple TV 4K which is connected to wifi. I'm happy with it. But part of that is I can use my iPhone as a remote. The Apple TV remote app on the phone is much nicer than the Apple TV remote hardware.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-02 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2026-01-02 08:07 pm (UTC)The best streaming devices are the Apple TV, Roku, and Firestick (Amazon) lines. I personally like Roku best, as it has a super-simple interface, a very simple but functional remote, and the biggest app store that's full of all sorts of curious niche streamers. Also you get the Roku Channel with it, that has a ton of content of all sorts if you choose to look around. But if privacy is a top concern, Apple is the way to go.
One more advantage of using a streaming device rather than a "smart" tv for your streaming -- technology changes quickly. A TV display has a much longer life expectancy than any streaming protocol built into it. With an inexpensive external device that doesn't matter -- you can swap out an obsolete one for a latest-and-greatest version anytime you want for a modest cost. and the big display can keep on displaying undisturbed till it reaches the end of its days several tech cycles down the road.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-02 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2026-01-02 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2026-01-02 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2026-01-02 10:16 pm (UTC)If you only want to watch broadcast over the air programming, or recorded programming, the TV does not need to connect to the wireless network. It should be possible to go into the TV settings and turn off networking. Delete any network names and passwords. Make sure the TV is not connected to a wired ethernet network either. Basically, the idea is to turn the smart TV back into a dumb TV as much as possible.
If you want to watch TV programs streamed over the internet, you could connect the TV to the internet via wifi or ethernet to the DSL modem and the AT&T copper wire. Except that's not working, and even if it did, I would not recommend it, because TV sets are the worst for not respecting privacy.
If the TV is connected to a DVR and the DVR supports streaming video, then the DVR could be connected to the internet via wifi or ethernet to the DSL modem etcetera.
If you want streaming video and the DVR does not support it, and the TV has an extra HDMI port, you can get a streaming device and plug it into a HDMI port on the TV.
https://www.apple.com/apple-tv-4k/
https://www.roku.com/products/players
https://store.google.com/product/google_tv_streamer?hl=en-US
https://www.amazon.com/firetv/streaming-media-players
From the point of view of the TV, it is just another video input that can be selected. This is good, because it allows you to configure the TV as a dumb TV and keep it off your network. Only the streaming device has to connect to the internet.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-02 10:34 pm (UTC)We mostly only watch broadcast over the air programming on our tv, but we watch it through the internet connection. We don't watch it over the airwaves because we don't have an antenna, and we do occasionally watch cable channels. And I'm not going to go to the trouble of installing an antenna on a rented house.
I'm still not quite sure what "streaming video" means. Does it mean things like Netflix and Disney+? We can get those on our tv, though we usually watch them on the computer - or B. does, I don't watch Disney+ on my computer any more, because I get no sound from Disney+ and nobody has been able to solve that problem, and now I can't watch it on the tv either, because the tv is getting no signal from the wifi.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-03 12:51 am (UTC)I was not able to find anything about AT&T providing TV/cable service. They just provide phone and internet service. But you can use their internet service to connect to all the streaming video services. I assume that is what you mean by cable channels. Unless you are also subscribing to Comcast/Xfinity cable or something like that.
A good rabbit ears indoor TV antenna is around $20-$25 and works for the local TV stations.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-03 02:53 am (UTC)I'm remembering the trouble we had in my childhood getting a reliable signal from a big rooftop antenna, quite geographically close to here. Use a rabbit-ear? No friggin' way!
On top of which, I'm sure if I go to an antenna, the government will announce the discontinuation of over-the-air broadcast tv, on the grounds that nobody uses it any more. A few years ago there was some major change in broadcast signalling, and various experts, or people posing as experts, gave completely contradictory information on what it meant and how it worked. And I found that if I reported to a person holding one opinion what people said who held other opinions, hoping for some form of data reconciliation, all that happened was that the person I was reporting to got furious at me for retailing this guff.
My desire to avoid getting caught up in any further instance of this is intense.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-03 08:20 am (UTC)