calimac: (Default)
[personal profile] calimac
So I was sitting in the members' lounge at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival, having a lively conversation with the young man tending the lounge and a woman of about my own age, who was wearing a nametag identifying her as Susan, a Festival volunteer.

We were talking about reading Shakespeare's plays as allegories, and whether it made a difference if Shakespeare intended it that way. I commented, "A famous author once drew a distinction between allegory, which lies in the control of the author, and applicability, which lies in the freedom of the reader."

"Oh, I like that," said Susan. "Let me write it down," and she pulled out an e-device to do so. "Who said that?" she asked.

"Tolkien," I said. "It's from the foreword to the second edition of The Lord of the Rings."

Both my hearers were impressed with the specificity of this offhand citation, and after I modestly admitted to a certain degree of expertise in Tolkien, Susan said, "You must really like fantasy literature."

"Actually, I hate fantasy," I said. "Pull down a fantasy novel at random from the bookstore shelf and I'll probably hate it. I only like a few good authors."

"Like who?"

Judging it best not to retreat to the real old masters, I named some newer authors who are only recently deceased. Ursula K. Le Guin, whom Susan had heard of. Diana Wynne Jones, whom she hadn't. Patricia McKillip.

Susan mentioned Octavia Butler. I agreed she's a great writer, but really more science fiction than fantasy.

"I've been reading a newer author whom I'm really enjoying," offered the young man. I asked who that was, and from his reaction he must have seen my face fall when he said it was Brandon Sanderson.

I explained: "I read his first novel, Elantris, and couldn't make head or tail of it. But don't let me get in the way. These books are written to be enjoyed, and if you enjoy them, they're serving their purpose."

Date: 2024-10-18 01:09 am (UTC)
conuly: (Default)
From: [personal profile] conuly
Brandon Sanderson's books can be neatly divided into his juvenile fiction, which is often a bit quirky and I like it, and the other stuff, which is... well, it's not.

Date: 2024-10-18 03:40 pm (UTC)
voidampersand: (Default)
From: [personal profile] voidampersand
I loved The Emperor's Soul. Read it because it was a Hugo finalist. I think it's Sanderson's masterpiece. He can write truly fine, philosophical, emotionally powerful fantasy when he puts his mind to it.

I tried reading some of his longer work. It was not the same quality. I found that I liked the characters, the worldbuilding was original and not derivative, and there were some good plot twists. Sanderson is a more energetic writer than most and he delivers above-average fantasy product in astounding quantity. That's not really what I am looking for, but I can understand why he has lots of happy readers. I got a copy of Elantris because Moshe edited it, but I haven't read it yet.

For current fantasy authors, I like to recommend Sofia Samatar and Sarah Tolmie.

Date: 2024-10-19 02:30 pm (UTC)
brithistorian: (Default)
From: [personal profile] brithistorian
"These books are written to be enjoyed, and if you enjoy them, they're serving their purpose."

Well said! Learning that the enjoyment and quality aren't necessarily tied together was extremely freeing for me.

Date: 2024-10-25 07:12 pm (UTC)
athenais: (Default)
From: [personal profile] athenais
Elantris irritated the living daylights out of me and I never read anything else by him. But I do think he writes acceptable fantasy for a certain type of fantasy reader, though it is not me.

Profile

calimac: (Default)
calimac

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
78 9 10 11 12 13
1415 16 17 18 1920
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 08:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios