SF agonistes
Oct. 11th, 2007 11:01 amWhen Octavia Butler was awarded one of those MacArthur "genius" grants a few years ago, everyone in the science fiction community was very proud of her. She was one of us (she was even a Clarion grad), and she was both one of our best and one relatively little-known outside the field.
I heard several people say that it would be impossible for ignorant critics to put down SF as a whole now, as a good SF author had been deemed worthy of a MacArthur grant.
That's not what happened. Instead, I saw comments to the effect that the MacArthurs had jumped the shark, as they'd lost their minds enough to give a grant to an (ugh) science fiction writer.
So I wonder what will happen now that Doris Lessing is being presented with the Nobel Prize in Literature. Will the same kind of critics say that the Nobel Prize is meaningless? Will they drum up, as they do whenever they don't like the current winner, the names of such obscure past recipients at Selma Lagerlöf to make fun of? (Ironically, though there are more renowned Nobel literature laureates whom I haven't read, I have read Lagerlöf. They're still proud of her in Sweden. When I was about 9 we had a Swedish au pair girl, and she gave me a copy of a translation of Lagerlöf's children's classic The Wonderful Adventures of Nils.)
The alternative course, naturally, is to deny that Lessing writes science fiction. Because it's good, you see, so it can't be SF. And it's true that she doesn't write only SF, or is as intimately tied with the community as Butler was. Never mind that Lessing attended a World Science Fiction Convention as a Guest of Honor, or that she cheerfully identified her SF work as SF, there's always room for this sort of in-denial nonsense.
I heard several people say that it would be impossible for ignorant critics to put down SF as a whole now, as a good SF author had been deemed worthy of a MacArthur grant.
That's not what happened. Instead, I saw comments to the effect that the MacArthurs had jumped the shark, as they'd lost their minds enough to give a grant to an (ugh) science fiction writer.
So I wonder what will happen now that Doris Lessing is being presented with the Nobel Prize in Literature. Will the same kind of critics say that the Nobel Prize is meaningless? Will they drum up, as they do whenever they don't like the current winner, the names of such obscure past recipients at Selma Lagerlöf to make fun of? (Ironically, though there are more renowned Nobel literature laureates whom I haven't read, I have read Lagerlöf. They're still proud of her in Sweden. When I was about 9 we had a Swedish au pair girl, and she gave me a copy of a translation of Lagerlöf's children's classic The Wonderful Adventures of Nils.)
The alternative course, naturally, is to deny that Lessing writes science fiction. Because it's good, you see, so it can't be SF. And it's true that she doesn't write only SF, or is as intimately tied with the community as Butler was. Never mind that Lessing attended a World Science Fiction Convention as a Guest of Honor, or that she cheerfully identified her SF work as SF, there's always room for this sort of in-denial nonsense.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:42 pm (UTC)