The original lawsuit is false in almost every particular (it did get Peter's name and current location right) and is best understood as an attempted coup by unscrupulous people who are unduly influencing Peter. With big film and musical deals in play, these people sought to get rid of the person who stood between them and grabbing everything for themselves.
There really are only two possibilities here: either Peter S. Beagle's own children and Connor Cochran are evil people preying on him, or they are good people trying to rescue him. The facts make plain that option #2 is correct.
no subject
Date: 2016-01-08 07:57 pm (UTC)http://conlanpress.com/joint-statement-regarding-frivolous-lawsuit/
The original lawsuit is false in almost every particular (it did get Peter's name and current location right) and is best understood as an attempted coup by unscrupulous people who are unduly influencing Peter. With big film and musical deals in play, these people sought to get rid of the person who stood between them and grabbing everything for themselves.
There really are only two possibilities here: either Peter S. Beagle's own children and Connor Cochran are evil people preying on him, or they are good people trying to rescue him. The facts make plain that option #2 is correct.