why I'm not rushing out to see Avatar
Dec. 19th, 2009 11:05 ama review of Dave's review and the comments.
Third runner-up, Descriptions Least Likely to Make Me Want to See Avatar: "Worth watching for the effects, but don't expect much from the story." I've already seen that movie; I don't want to see it again.
Second runner-up, Descriptions Least Likely to Make Me Want to See Avatar: "Dune in the jungle." Oh boy, I've seen that movie too. The book was better, but as the defenders of Hollywood trashings are always telling us, a book is not a movie.
First runner-up, Descriptions Least Likely to Make Me Want to See Avatar: "Heinlein meets McCaffrey." I've read those books.
And the winner, The Description Least Likely to Make Me Want to See Avatar is: "Dances with Wolves on another planet."
Third runner-up, Descriptions Least Likely to Make Me Want to See Avatar: "Worth watching for the effects, but don't expect much from the story." I've already seen that movie; I don't want to see it again.
Second runner-up, Descriptions Least Likely to Make Me Want to See Avatar: "Dune in the jungle." Oh boy, I've seen that movie too. The book was better, but as the defenders of Hollywood trashings are always telling us, a book is not a movie.
First runner-up, Descriptions Least Likely to Make Me Want to See Avatar: "Heinlein meets McCaffrey." I've read those books.
And the winner, The Description Least Likely to Make Me Want to See Avatar is: "Dances with Wolves on another planet."
no subject
Date: 2009-12-19 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-19 09:02 pm (UTC)I think Dave's review gets some important points wrong and misses some others - the aliens' interest in Jake as a warrior is because contact by scientists so clearly hasn't worked, and for another reason that I think amazingly important to the extent of being a spoiler.
It is an oddly idealistic movie in its profoundly compromised way and as such is vulnerable to cynicism, if you let it be.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-19 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-20 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-20 03:44 am (UTC)