unenchanted

[calimac]

We watched the film Enchanted last night, and I found it rather disappointing. Sure, the premise is clever and ingenious, and Amy Adams makes an impossible role work, though that shouldn't be too surprising if you've seen Junebug, where she plays basically the same spunky character with a more worldly background.

But otherwise it was yet another ho-hum dreary run-of-the-mill hack fantasy movie. The characters have no romantic chemistry, leading to an ending that feels more polyamorous than conventionally pair-bonding, which I doubt was the intended effect. The scene where the beasts and bugs of New York City clean the apartment was absolutely creepy, and I'm not sure that was the intended effect either. The actors are ineptly directed. Patrick Dempsey is pathetic. James Marsden is under-utilized. Susan Sarandon chews scenery, but is underfed. Timothy Spall plays Peter Pettigrew again. The chipmunk gets old fast. The songs are almost as dire as their performances at the Oscars had led me to believe. The plot is wayward and full of motivational and strategic holes that could perhaps be filled, but that's the problem: you'd have to fill them. The climax includes the sine qua non of bad fantasy movies, scenes in which the actors stand around staring blankly at blue screens not yet filled with overblown special effects battles.

Look, I know it's possible to make a perfect fairy tale movie. It's called Shrek. If you can't play in that league, don't call on me.

Comments

[smofbabe.livejournal.com]

I have to agree about the lack of chemistry and the lethargy of Patrick Dempsey. Plus, there were definitely some plot holes and inconsistencies. (The main one for me was how Timothy Spall could have adjusted so rapidly to New York that he was able to masquerade as a waiter, cart owner, etc. Either people from that universe could function in the new environment or they couldn't...) However, we overall enjoyed this and it was the very incongruity of creepy cockroaches scrubbing a tub that made the scene amusing. The parts where it winked at fairy-tale conventions worked for me, and I thought the winking was sweeter and less in-your-face than SHREK, much as I liked SHREK.

[asimovberlioz.livejournal.com]

I haven't seen "Enchanted" yet. Does that cleaning-up scene have pigeons flapping around instead of cute li'l bluebirds?

[wild-patience.livejournal.com]

This could be a whole new market for Disney: polyamorous romantic comedies!

[divertimento.livejournal.com]

The very first Disney feature film already had a perfect title to include in that polyamorous series.

[anderyn.livejournal.com]

Disney polyamory? Innnnteresting. That would've made it a very different picture.

Now, I liked Shrek , true, but I also liked Enchanted, simply because it felt less... satirical? I thought Amy Adams made the movie because she felt very Disney princess-ish.

[kalimac.livejournal.com]

What I meant was - and I hope I'll be excused a spoiler down this far in the comments - that the matching of Giselle and Robert didn't feel like the inevitable establishment of true love after chaos. Instead, it felt forced - because there was no romantic chemistry between them - and like the breakup and divorce of two established couples in order to form this new pair. And the pairing of the discarded Nancy and Edward only reinforced this. I guess "polyamory" isn't really what I meant; I should have said "serial monogamy."

[lynn-maudlin.livejournal.com]

I've not seen it yet, although I saw costumes Saturday at our annual FIDM-jaunt and we saw Miss Pettigrew Lives For A Day, which I recommend and also features Amy Adams.

I had trouble with Shrek in the theatre - it took me so long to get past the disgusting opening title sequence. DVD is blissful because I just start the movie with Chapter Two... {grin}