http://kalimac.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] calimac 2008-05-28 11:29 pm (UTC)

It follows because God is defined (by theologians - and they're the ones who get to do the defining) as a being outside the created universe. If you define God as part of the universe, you are defining a being that theologians do not recognize as God. Evidence of its nonexistence is of no significance.

Taking the metaphor of God being to the universe as an author is to a book, redefining the book as including its author does such violence to both the concepts of "book" and "author" as to render their study meaningless.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting