It follows because God is defined (by theologians - and they're the ones who get to do the defining) as a being outside the created universe. If you define God as part of the universe, you are defining a being that theologians do not recognize as God. Evidence of its nonexistence is of no significance.
Taking the metaphor of God being to the universe as an author is to a book, redefining the book as including its author does such violence to both the concepts of "book" and "author" as to render their study meaningless.
no subject
Taking the metaphor of God being to the universe as an author is to a book, redefining the book as including its author does such violence to both the concepts of "book" and "author" as to render their study meaningless.