calimac: (Default)
calimac ([personal profile] calimac) wrote2021-03-17 04:57 pm

James Levine

The once-esteemed conductor died last week. Since most of the obits I've seen concentrate on the greatness of his conducting, I feel the best response is to link to my previous posts about this character.

The case of James Levine.

The case of James Levine cont'd.
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2021-03-18 09:54 am (UTC)(link)
They say you should look at the art and not the artist, but there are times I'm willing to make exceptions.

Richard Dadd, my home town artist, was mentally ill and Gesualdo da Venosa's crimes I can understand in the context of their times but not Levine's.
adrian_turtle: (Default)

[personal profile] adrian_turtle 2021-03-19 05:57 pm (UTC)(link)
They say you should look at the art and not the artist,

What was Levine's art? He didn't sit down alone with a paintbrush, to make a piece of art that people could look at when he and everyone touched by his abuse was far away. He was a conductor. The whole point of his art was controlling musicians; directing them, teaching them, making them do what he wanted. He did that unethically, and it cannot be separated from the art.